# Question - Compliance Analysis Finding permission issue

**URL:** https://discussions.eramba.org/t/question-compliance-analysis-finding-permission-issue/2451
**Category:** Forum - Software
**Created:** [November 24, 2022, 4:06pm UTC](https://discussions.eramba.org/t/question-compliance-analysis-finding-permission-issue/2451 "2022-11-24T16:06:34Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kisero](https://discussions.eramba.org/user_avatar/discussions.eramba.org/kisero/32/2925_2.png) [@kisero](https://discussions.eramba.org/u/kisero)
#### Post date: [November 25, 2022, 5:20pm UTC](https://discussions.eramba.org/t/question-compliance-analysis-finding-permission-issue/2451/2 "2022-11-25T17:20:23Z")

</div>

> [@renato.coneglian](#):
>
> The only issue we are having is that the user is being able to add Findings to all packages, and the expected was to see only the package he is one of the owners.

i understand what you want but is not the way eramba works, “add” means you “add” no matter where that item is applied. the idea that visualisations (which is. what prevents the user from seeing other packages) should be applied to “fields” within a form is not something we have now.

its pretty complicated piece of code to build and we are not nearly there to be honest. next year we want to start working on field level actions ([user defined workflow](https://discussions.eramba.org/t/feature-bloody-user-defined-workflows/1114), [triggers](https://discussions.eramba.org/t/feature-triggers/1774), etc) so maybe this is something to consider when we get there.

int ref: [https://github.com/eramba/eramba/issues/3963](https://github.com/eramba/eramba/issues/3963)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discussions.eramba.org/t/question-compliance-analysis-finding-permission-issue/2451)._
